Skip to main content

Obama and McSame are Both Wrong on Energy

(and both right, too.)

I guess it's too much to ask during the political silly season for a real discussion about what needs to happen regarding U.S. (and world) energy policy.

Offshore Drilling:
Obama is correct in asserting that this will have no immediate effect on prices. He is wrong, however to assert that opening up more offshore acreage is unnecessary.

McCain is correct in asserting that there are potentially large reserves that can be tapped in currently embargoed U.S. waters. He is incorrect to assert that tapping these will provide any immediate relief at the pump.

Long-term, the U.S. will need stable and local sources of hydrocarbons -- not just for energy, but for all the products that require it as part of the manufacturing process or as the base material.

Two reasons to open up more acreage for exploration: we need to find out what is there (and commercial) and it needs to be in the queue for eventual development. Once doesn't happen without the other.

Obama's surrogates point to the fact that there is still a lot of already available acreage on public lands that hasn't been explored or developed. They ignore several factors:

  1. Competition for exploration and development resources -- there just aren't enough drill ships and skilled people to put to work to bring these things online any time soon. It wasn't that long ago that most oil companies were laying people off and certainly not hiring. Drill rigs were idled, dismantled or sold overseas.
  2. Rising costs -- it used to cost between $100-$150K per day to run an exploration drill ship. That cost today is between $175K and $250K -- depending on how deep you're going. Deepwater wells routinely start at a water depth of more than 6000 feet -- and that's just to get to the ocean floor... they then have to go down another 3 - 4 miles to hit paydirt.
  3. Current crude oil prices at these levels are less than 3 years old... many of the prospects that are now looking okay wouldn't pass economic muster 5-8 years ago -- and it takes that long to get from discovery to development.
  4. The "public land" that they talk about also includes all the onshore acreage that has been sitting idle for years because (despite the hype) shale oil is still uneconomic.
  5. Environmental permitting for every phase is still a byzantine mess.
  6. Did I mention the technical complexity of doing all this under a mile of water -- on engineering marvels that cost more that $1B?

Does this mean that we can drill our way out of this? Absolutely not, but a comprehensive energy policy is going to have to include a long-term U.S. resource plan. (Until someone comes up with a wind-powered airplane...)

McSame's surrogates are equally fuzzy with their math... more on that in future posts.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Just Desserts: Double Peanut Butter Bars

This recipe takes the simple peanut butter cookie and "raises the bar"... with three layers: Peanut Butter Cookie on the bottom Rich peanut butter icing in the middle Topped with a chocolate shell Delicious and decadent! For the cookie base: Preheat oven to 350F.  Grease a 9x13 glass baking dish. 1 1/4 cup sugar 1 tablespoon dark molasses 1/2 cup creamy peanut buter 1/4 cup shortening 1/4 cup butter, softened 1 egg 1 1/4 cups flour 3/4 teaspoon baking soda 1/2 teaspoon baking powder 1/4 teaspoon salt Prepare peanut butter cookie dough (per normal recipe)  but do not refrigerate.  Instead, spread dough evenly on the bottom of the prepared baking dish. Bake for about 15-18 minutes.  Remove from oven and allow to cool completely.  For the middle layer: 1/2 cup butter, softened 1/2 cup creamy peanut butter 1 tablespoon milk 1 teaspoon vanilla 2 cups powdered sugar In a small bowl, beat the butter, peanut butter, milk, vanilla...
5 comments
Read more

60 Minutes & Chevron

I don't normally post stuff about work, but after watching the drivel on 60 Minutes last night about the "Ecuadorian" lawsuit against Chevron, I had to relay this: Images are of Petroecuador sites and are not Texaco-remediated sites: The images of oil pits, and oil operations in general, that “60 Minutes” used are of locations that are the sole responsibility of Petroecuador, Texaco Petroleum’s partner from the days of the consortium. “60 Minutes” knew this fact, but chose to ignore it in its reporting. No responsibility was placed on Petroecuador: Petroecuador has been the sole operator of oil fields in Ecuador since 1992 and has compiled a well-documented record of environmental mismanagement. In addition, Petroecuador has repeatedly stated that it is responsible for the remaining cleanup work that is required in the Ecuadorian Amazon and it readily admits that it has not cleaned up the sites allocated to them under the remediation action plan 15 years ago. Again, “60 M...
Post a Comment
Read more

Promise? What Promise?

from the NYT " The Caucus " blog... "A gaggle of sign-waving protestors milled around outside The Beverly Hilton, the sprawling hotel on Wilshire Boulevard. They must have caught the president’s eye when he arrived at the hotel from an earlier stop in Las Vegas because he relayed one of their messages to the crowd. 'One of them said, “Obama keep your promise,’ the president said. 'I thought that’s fair. I don’t know which promise he was talking about.' The people in the audience – who paid $30,400 per couple to attend – laughed as they ate a dinner of roasted tenderloin, grilled organic chicken and sun choke rosemary mashed potatoes." Feel free to take this image and put it on your blog -- or even on a poster or t-shirt. Just do me the favor of linking back here and/or putting a link to your blog (or a picture of the graphic in action) in the comments. Thanks!
2 comments
Read more